Let R be the set of real numbers
Statement-1 : is an integer is an equivalence relation on .
Statement-2: for some rational number is an equivalence relation on R .
Statement-1 : is an integer is an equivalence relation on .
Statement-2: for some rational number is an equivalence relation on R .
- (A)Statement -1 is true, Statement -2 is true; Statement -2 is not a correct explanation for Statement - 1
- (B)Statement -1 is true, Statement- 2 is false.✓ Correct
- (C)Statement -1 is false, Statement- 2 is true.
- (D)Statement -1 is true, Statement -2 is true; Statement -2 is a correct explanation for Statement -1
Answer: (B)
Solution
For , is an integer so it is reflexive; if is an integer so is , giving symmetry; and is an integer, giving transitivity, so is an equivalence relation and the first statement is true. For , makes it reflexive, but it fails symmetry: holds for every , yet forces , so a related pair does not give related. Thus is not an equivalence relation and the second statement is false.
JEE Main · 2011 · 10 Apr 2011 · Offline · Single correct option